Humans in good mental health and of reasonable intelligence are organisms capable of comprehending their own existence, and of deciding on when that existence becomes sufficiently burdensome that it is no longer desirable. Why should continued existence be forced upon one against one's will?
Some pertinent quotes
- "Making someone die in a way that others approve, but the dying person believes to be a horrifying contradiction of his life, is a devastating, odious form of tyranny."
- Ronald Dworkin; philosopher and scholar
- "The only part of the conduct of any one, for which [a citizen] is
amenable to society, is that which concerns others.
In the part which merely concerns himself, his independence is, of right,
Over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign."
- John Stuart Mill, in On Liberty
- "... suicide is the most basic right of all. If freedom is self-ownership—ownership over one's own life and body—then the right to end that life is the most basic of all. If others can force you to live, you do not own yourself and belong to them."
- Thomas Szasz (the above quote is taken from Wikipedia.)
No one else, no society, no religious group, no government, has any right to interfere in that decision.
Whether or not a 'terminal illness' is involved is irrelevant; we are all going to die, it's just a matter of time.
Before ending his (or her) own life, however, the person has to consider the impact of his decision on those who are dear to him, and to whom he may be dear, and any who may be dependent upon him (children, spouse).
The relevant questions he must ask are:
- Am I enjoying life?
- If not, is that a temporary condition? Depression? Will the condition improve with time?
- Am I a net asset to, or burden on, society and those around me?
- What impact would my suicide have on my family? Can I prepare them for that?
Advanced age and deteriorating health and fitness may well be a factor in whether a person decides he has had enough.
Living with pain is pretty miserable.
I am writing this section from a personal point of view.
I can imagine wanting to end my life for the first of these reasons or some combination of them all.
- Advancing age, declining physical and/or mental health and/or increasingly consistent or intense pain;
- Disillusionment with my fellow Man, and disgust for many of them:
- For the greedy, who have far more than most and far more than they need but can never have enough;
Then there are the uplifting people
Of course there are the heroes who provide great examples of how good humans can be.
I've listed a very few on another page
on this site.
The pleasure one gets from reading about such people, and seeing examples of good people on a smaller scale closer to home, can go a long way to restoring one's faith in human nature.
- Disillusionment due to all those who cannot see that we should not only protect our environment, we should always put if first. Without our environment we have nothing;
- Disillusionment with the great majority, for their apathy, selfishness, short-sightedness (it is, of course, the common people who vote the government into power), and for putting their selfish interests before the good of the planet;
- For the general neglect and lack of caring by the great majority about the obvious
unsustainability of our current way of life.
- For powerful people, like Gina Rinehart, Angus Taylor, Clive Palmer and Rupert Murdoch who use their power for evil;
- For government, which is often dominated by people who seem to have no ethical standards (for example, the Morrison government of Australia);
- Disgust with so many of the world's leaders, who just want power at any cost (Xi Jinping of China is a classic example);
- Disgust for those who willingly do the bidding of the tyrants; the police who beat, jail and torture peaceful protesters, the judges who condemn innocent people;
- Disgust for the hangers-on of the dictators and tyrants. People like Vladimir Putin could not remain in power if not for all those who support him because they see it as being to their personal advantage, while the majority suffer;
- Disgust for the political hacks; those who support the government's actions simply because of 'party loyalty', with no consideration for right or wrong;
- Disappointment in all those who spend their time on pointless pastimes when with very little effort they could be doing good;
- At trying to make the world a better place but finding little company in that endeavour;
- At the many stupid people (or are most of them dishonest rather than stupid?) who either don't believe that anthropogenic
climate change is happening or that it is a serious problem;
- At seeing millions of people who morn the war-dead yet do nothing to try to stop future wars;
- At seeing well meaning people waste their time on causes that are trivial and even foolish rather than on one or more of the many very urgent and important causes that they could work on (an example of a foolish cause, opposing the proposed low-medium level
radioactive waste repository in South Australia);
- At the billions of people who accept the religion delusion (or other delusions and superstitions), in the total lack of any supporting evidence, and in a world in which rational and responsible action is increasingly needed;
- At the lack of critical thinking, and consequent belief of falsehoods, in so many of my fellow human beings;
- I wouldn't want to go on living if I become a burden on society and can no longer
contribute meaningfully to the community in which I live.
(As of November 2019 I do voluntary work in the Clare Gleeson Wetlands, revegetating the 'Central Park' in Crystal Brook, at
Bowman Park near Crystal Brook, picking up roadside rubbish, etc.)
Peter Saul wrote a piece titled Do people really have the right to a rational suicide?
for The Conversation, 2014/07/28. While not condemning rational suicide he was disapproving in his tone. Yet he gave no justification for his apparent opposition. I found his article unconvincing, less well thought out than most on The Conversation.
He does at one point write "your right to die becomes my obligation to kill", but this does not apply to suicide at all, it applies to assisted death. It does not apply to people, such as myself, who intend to arrange our own deaths, unassisted. And in any case, so far as I have heard, no one is proposing that anyone will be obliged to assist in a death against their will; there will be no 'obligation to kill'.
I am old, my children are grown up with their own families, they are not dependent on me. No one will be worse off by my death. If my wife is still alive at the time I will make sure that she approves of my decision. I expect that we will be sharing a house with our daughter and her family at the time so she will not be left alone. We may choose to die together.
No one will be harmed by my death. In fact it could be argued that I will be doing a good deed by my suicide:
- The state pays my superannuation. I will be saving the taxpayers a financial burden;
- The world is grossly overpopulated. One less person will ease the load on the planet;
- My investments and possessions will pass to others - to their advantage.
Further to the point above about the world being overpopulated
- all else being equal, if there were half as many people on Earth there would be half as much stress on the overstressed environment, there would be half the amount of greenhouse gasses to cause anthropogenic climate change
, there would be half as many human mouths to feed, so less demand on agriculture. Reducing the world's population, in itself, even by one, has to be a desirable thing.
If an old person, such as myself, is facing declining health and fitness and increasing pain he/she must expect to at some time not be able to look after himself. He must expect at some time to no longer be able to contribute
much to the society in which he lives, instead he must expect to become a burden to that society.
What choices does he have?
- go into an aged care home;
- get help to live at home;
- or end his life.
The first two alternatives involve loss of freedom and self respect
and increased dependency on the work and probably the financial support of others.
For myself I would prefer the third alternative.
Hanging is one of the most common ways that people suicide. It would be a terrible way of dying. Some people shoot themselves and leave the very unpleasant job of cleaning up the mess to others; and it is possible to botch the job and make yourself seriously mentally damaged rather than dead.
There are painless, sure, clean and gentle ways of ending one's own life. Exit International provides support for those wanting to end their lives. I have great respect for Doctor Philip Nitschke and the organisation he created, Exit International.
I have the means to end my life gently, painlessly, and cleanly. I learned about it from Exit International.