If you build a house in the country it can be very expensive to connect to
the grid: $20,000 is not unusual.
Setting up a stand-alone power supply is then perfectly understandable.
This page is mostly about leaving a power grid to which one is already connected.
When people install solar power they tend to resent paying more for the power they buy than they get for the power they sell to the grid. They may feel that they are being taken advantage of, so they are tempted to disconnect from the power grid.
It is quite possible to stay on the power grid and buy very little power. Simply installing a solar PV system greatly reduces the amount of power you need to buy. If you install a home battery you could reduce it to near nothing, but still remain connected, for your own benefit, so that you can access power when your home system falls short and you can sell your excess power.
As stated in the introduction, there are good altruistic reasons for not disconnecting from the grid, but it is also very much to you own benefit to remain connected so that it is there when you might need it.
The fact that the selling price that you get paid when you put power into the grid is much lower than the buying price when you take power from the grid is mainly due to three things:
- A large part of the cost of supplying power is in the transmission and distribution network;
- The companies that run the power transmission and distribution system quite reasonably want to make a profit;
- You sell your power when you have excess and you buy power when you need it – there are big costs involved in balancing generation with consumption.
If, in addition to installing solar power, they add a home battery it can become feasible to disconnect from the grid. But my point with this page is that this is neither a wise nor an environmentally friendly thing to do.
You can have independence without going off-grid
You can install solar PV (or a wind generator) and batteries and have them as
a backup should the grid fail without disconnecting from the grid.
It's the best of both worlds; independence and your excess power displaces
dirty fossil fuel generated power.
Ask a reputable solar power installer about it.
If you go off-grid you will save the connection fee, which is probably around 80¢ a day ($290/year). That is the only advantage to you.
Apart from the high cost of securing your power supply when you go off-grid there are two main disadvantages:
- If you use less electricity than your system can generate the remainder will go to waste;
- If the sun isn't shining and your battery is flat you either have to run a generator (which is expensive to buy and run and is polluting) or you go without power.
The amount you can store in a battery is very limited. If your solar power system is big enough to keep you supplied in winter it will generate far more than you need in the other 3/4 of the year.
If you go off-grid you will not be able to sell your excess electricity and no one else will be able to use it.
If it did go into the grid it would displace an equal amount of 'dirty' fossil
How would you feel about it if a decision you made for selfish reasons
adversely affected the nation's greenhouse gas production rates?
The amount paid for electricity that you feed into the grid varies between retailers but is probably around 8-12¢/kWh. If you have a solar system that is big enough to supply your needs in winter you will be able to sell quite a lot of power in the remainder of the year. The amount you receive for your excess electricity will likely be much more than the connection fee. If you go off grid you deny yourself this potential income.
Also, if you go off-grid, you deny yourself backup power should your home generation fall short or fail for any reason.
Are steeply angled panels really best for winter?
In my area (Clare, SA) we get little direct sunshine in winter.
We have many hours of overcast weather with diffuse light coming from the
whole of the sky.
In these conditions the panels will be more productive if they are nearly
horizontal, so that light from the whole sky can get to them.
To a small extent the reduced generation of solar panels in winter can be counteracted by placing the solar panels at a steep angle; this means less electricity is generated in summer and in total for the whole year, but when the winter's sun does shine the panels are facing it and winter generation is maximised.
(Or probably maximised – see the box on the right.)
The following is based on figures provided in an article
titled "Should I quit the grid?" written by Andrew Reddaway, printed in the magazine ReNew, which is published by the Alternative Technology Association.
Reading 'between the lines' the article suggests that a 4kW solar installation is large enough to generate more power than many households' annual electricity consumption (and I would agree with this; especially for those people who were aware of, and cared about, their energy consumption).
High solar feed-in tariffs, 2018
In at least some Australian states the payment per kilowatt-hour on offer for the excess electricity that a householder feeds into the grid has risen very substantially.
For example, on 2018/12/19
was showing that a number of retailers in South Australia were offering 16¢ to 23¢/kWh; up from 6-8¢/kWh a few years earlier.
One of my properties has 6.7 kW of solar panels and exports an average of about 25 kWh/day (9,300 kWh/year) into the grid.
At the 20¢/kWh my retailer is offering this is worth $1,850/year to me; a substantial amount.
Mr Reddaway goes on to estimate that to go off the grid a 10kW solar system
together with about 65 kWh of battery storage would be required at a total cost
of about $55,000; this apparently does not include a back-up diesel generator
which would also be needed.
The higher capacity solar system is needed to generate sufficient power
during winter, when many days will be cloudy and all will be short.
A solar power system in southern Australia can be expected to have a capacity
factor of about 18%.
This means that a 4kW system will generate about 6300 kWh each year
(4 × 0.18 × 24 × 365) and a
10kW system will generate about 15,800 kWh each year
(10 × 0.18 × 24 × 365).
So, this off-grid home would generate about 15,800 kWh of power each year, but
consume only about 6300 kWh.
The difference, 9500 kWh of potential generation, would be wasted.
If this house, with its annual consumption of 6300 kWh and 10kW of solar power
stayed on the grid, that excess 9500 kWh would be fed into the grid.
If the house was to remain on the grid it could displace 9500 kWh of
reduce the nation's emissions by 5-10 tonnes of carbon dioxide each year
(see CO2 released per kWh) and produce an
income for the householder of $760/year (if the electricity was sold for
$0.08/kWh to an energy retailer such as Diamond Energy).
I have a shack with 6.7KW of solar PV installed on its roof.
In the first year of operation, I exported 10.2 megawatt-hours of electricity
into the power grid from my solar power installation.
In Australia where most of our grid electricity is generated by burning coal
it has been calculated that the generation of each megawatt-hour of
electricity results in the release of about one tonne of carbon dioxide.
So, by remaining connected to the grid, my solar power has reduced Australia's
greenhouse gas production by about ten tonnes in the first year.
Those who go off-grid will no longer be able to feed renewable electricity
into the grid; this electricity, had it gone into the grid, would have
displaced some fossil-fuel generated electricity.
They will quite probably use a fossil-fuel (petrol or diesel) powered
generator to give them power when their PV (or wind or hydro) is not
Both effects will increase the nation's greenhouse emissions compared to
what they would have been if these people stayed on-grid.
If you care about
climate change and
don't go off-grid.
Greenough River solar farm, WA
Google Earth image, 2014/06/17
This solar farm feeds clean power into the grid and that displaces fossil
Your solar PV can do the same with the power that you don't need –
so long as you don't go off-grid.
The owners of the 'poles and wires' have huge investment in the high
voltage transmission lines and in the many more kilometres of medium and
low voltage power lines.
They have, as businesses generally expect, received an income on their
If many people 'drop out of the system' the income inevitably declines.
The bigger users of power will not be able to go off-grid.
At present they get their power at lower prices than the rest of us, so
even if they were able to generate enough power from solar PV, and store it
sufficiently cheaply, for their needs, they could probably not do it at
How big will the impact of smaller users going off-grid be to those who run
I am not willing to even guess.
This is a very difficult question.
At present they seem to be reacting to declining demand by increasing their
charges, but of course this will encourage more people to install solar
or leave the grid.
As mentioned above, this trend, feeding on itself, has been called the
the power networks.
Ironically, at the same time, an increased amount of renewable energy on
the grid is forcing wholesale power prices down.
The situation is complicated in a state such as South Australia where the
power supply system is split between a number of more-or-less independent
businesses; there are the power generators, the
company that runs the high voltage long distance transmission lines, the
company that runs the medium to low voltage distribution lines, and the
All will be affected by the off-grid move.
Maybe each will react in a different way?
Snowtown Wind Farm
In 2014 most of the renewable electricity in Australia is coming from
hydro and wind power.
Only about half as much is coming from solar as from wind farms.
Plainly, if the grid was to fail, for economic or any other reasons,
the hydro stations, big solar stations, and wind farms would become stranded
In 2015 this seems unlikely to happen any time soon, both because the
bigger consumers of power will probably have to continue to rely on the grid
and because there are many smaller consumers who have not installed solar