Both Capitalism and Environmentalism arose in the industrial revolution. Capitalism from the money-making opportunities that came with mechanisation and environmentalism with the air pollution resulting from all that burning of coal to power the machinery.
This page was originally going to be titled: Capitalism, Communism and Environmentalism because communism was once seen as an alternative to capitalism. Communism has failed for reasons that I will not go into. It is irrelevant to the main subject of this page.
By the late twentieth century the dominance of capitalism, with its short-sighted pursuit of wealth, was destroying the world. Environmentalism was struggling to even remain in view.
Contact: David K. Clarke – © |
If we destroy our environment we have nothing
|
---|
To avoid greatly damaging our beautiful shared planet we must give the natural world top priority |
IntroductionSome would say that the two consepts, capitalism and environmentalism, are such totally different things that I shouldn't be throwing them together as I am doing here.The point I want to make with this page is that capitalism runs the world, and has done so over the past few hundred years. Capitalism and its essence, the pursuit of wealth, has resulted in the environmental disasters that the world is facing today. Environmentalism, giving the preservation of the natural world top priority, is almost the opposite of capitalism. If we don't place greater emphasis on environmentalism than on capitalism soon, we face a future on a greatly damaged planet. Communism was seen as an alternative to capitalism, but, at least to the present it has been a failure. In the two best known nations that tried it, Russia and China, it became corrupted beyond recognition. Stalin quickly became a ruthless dictator in Russia, under Mao Zedong in China it resulted in famines, cruelty and perverse abuse of power. I don't think any state in the world today operates under communist principles. I don't intend to discuss communism further on this page.
What's wrong with capitalism?
Capitalism is not necessarily unethical, but it is anethical; that is, it is neither ethical nor unethical, it is unconcerned with ethics. So, in effect, capitalism exploits the environment for the sake of maximising profits to the capitalists. Should we be surprised then, if in the early twenty-first century we are facing many insults to the natural world?
While capitalism itself is anethical (or amoral if you prefer), unfortunately a great many capitalists are unethical. Some Australians are among the most unethical of the world's capitalists.
EnvironmentalismIt is our environment that feeds us. It is our environment that 'replenishes our souls' when we take a walk in a park or a swim at a beach. Money is no substitute for a healthy environment.Humans seem naturally to be primarily selfish and only secondarily to consider the needs of others and the greater world. (A relevant page on this site: Selfishness or altruism?) This being so, how can we ever hope that the needs of the environment will be giving a higher priority than profits? Do we care enough to do it? Certainly our record so far is abysmal. |
Related pagesRelated pages on external sites...Wikipedia: Capitalism, EnvironmentalismCapitalism or the Environment by Gary Engler, 2013/10/04 Capitalist or Environmentalist? Who can make the biggest difference? by Sharon Bray, 2020/01/20. From an investor's point of view Australia must make the environment integral to economic decision-making, The Conversation, Carl Obst, 2017/01/16 |