Below I've provided arguments that:
I hold that these arguments are very convincing. If they are accepted, as they should be, it follows that:
Climate changeNo well informed, open minded, person can doubt that the burning of fossil fuels is one of the main causes of climate change.
Climate change is not just going to harm the planet at some time in the distant future, it is harming the planet at the present. The Australian Bureau of Meteorology State of the Climate Report, 2016 lists effects that are happening here and now (they are also listed under Related pages: effects of climate change, below).
Three of the photos that I have used on this page were taken within a very few kilometres of my home and show ill-effects that, while they cannot definitely be attributed to climate change, are quite probably connected, and relate to types of harm that can certainly be expected to happen more often in the future. (Defoliation of red stringybark, Bangor fire erosion, Exceptional storms)
Ocean acidificationLess well known than climate change, but equally supported by undeniable evidence, is the fact that the increased levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, due largely to the burning of fossil fuels, is causing our oceans to become more acidic.
Air pollutionThe burning of coal in particular, but also petroleum, produces air pollution that kills millions of people each year.
More intense/violent weather events, increased fire hazardClimate scientists have long warned that with global warming:
Rising sea levelsRising sea levels will displace millions of people from low-lying fertile and very densely populated areas such as the deltas of the Nile, Ganges, Brahmaputra, Red and Mekong rivers. Low-lying areas in the First World will not be immune; for example New York and a large part of Florida are very susceptible to flooding from sea level rise.
ExtinctionsClimate change, ocean acidification and air pollution affect most of life on Earth. The rate of species extinction has been estimated to be as high as a thousand times as high as has been typical during the history of the planet. We are living in a period of mass extinction comparable to only a half dozen or so in the history of life on Earth.
The damage is very long-termThe air pollution will end when the burning of fossil fuels ends, but the climate and ocean acidification will take decades or even centuries to stabilise.
Reducing fossil fuel consumption at a much
SA's renewable energy has, by competition, made the last remaining coal-fired power station in the state economically uncompetitive. It has closed down.
King Island, between Tasmania and the Australian mainland, has a largely
renewable power supply, combining wind power, solar power, batteries and a
flywheel; see graphic on the right.
Coober Pedy was transitioning from almost 100% diesel-powered electricity generation to around 50% renewables in a few months, February 2017.
The Australian Capital Territory (ACT) has a 100% renewable energy by 2020 target. The ACT government has contracted to buy most of the needed electricity from wind farms in South Australia, NSW and Victoria. At the time of writing (February 2017) most of the needed contracts had been agreed. (Some information on the contracts is on my page Wind Power in Australia.)
The ACT has the cheapest retail power prices in the nation.
If South Australia, Coober Pedy, King Island and the ACT can do this much, there can be no doubt that the remainder of Australia can do far more than is being done toward replacing fossil fuels with renewables.
Few people would say that changing an entire national grid to 100% renewables will be easy. Getting to 60% will not be difficult; getting to 80% will be considerably more difficult, getting the whole 100% will be very difficult indeed.
However, just because changing to 100% renewables is going to be hard is no reason for not taking steps along the way. It can be done by degrees.
Considering the harm done by the burning of fossil fuels and the relative
ease of replacing a substantial amount of fossil fuel
burning with renewable energy, the knowingly dishonest support of fossil
fuels and denigration of renewable energy by people in positions of power
and/or responsibility is rightly a crime because it is certainly a grave
offence against morality.
There is another type of crime; where people with great personal wealth or who control great corporations use that wealth and power to either:
Another way of making the public believe lies is by continually publishing (and/or broadcasting) them and employing journalists who are willing to comply in writing articles undermining climate science and the need to reduce greenhouse emissions. Rupert Murdoch is by far the most conspicuous criminal in this class.
The air pollution from the burning of coal kills 1.1 million Indians each year.
Perhaps the coal-export proponents would tell us that this is just a price that has to be paid to escape energy poverty.
This would also be false. We'd be doing the Indian people a much bigger favour if we were to help them develop non-polluting renewable wind and solar power to lift them out of energy poverty. You can't much enjoy having electric lights if you are dead.
The table on the right shows that electricity expenditure in the period from 2006 to 2016 has increased more in the predominently coal-powered states of Victoria, NSW and Queensland than they have in SA. (Most of SA's renewable energy was built in this period.)
The Australian Capital Territory is transitioning to 100% renewable electricity by 2020 and also has some of the cheapest retail electricity prices in the nation. As can be seen in the table, the ACT's growth in electricity costs is also among the lowest in the nation.
It seems that any honest person would put down the electricity price rises to causes other than renewables.
"Australia could stop producing greenhouse gasses tomorrow and it would make practically no difference to the world – we are too small to make a difference."Of course this is quite misleading, everyone on Earth could say something like:
"My village, my town, my city, my state/province, my coal mine, is too small to make a difference. It doesn't matter how much greenhouse gas emissions I am responsible for, I am too small to make a difference."An irresponsible person could say:
"I could stop throwing rubbish out of my car windows tomorrow. It would make only a tiny difference to the total amount of rubbish on the roadsides."Plainly, we all share in emitting greenhouse gasses, we all share in responsibility to reduce emissions; those who produce more than 'their share' have a higher responsibility to take effective action.
Australia ranks 53rd in the world in population, but sixth in the world in the CO2 produced by its electricity industry; it has 0.3% of the world's population, but produces 1.2% of the world's greenhouse gasses; it is well up among the worst greenhouse polluters on the planet. This gives Australians an ethical responsibility to reduce the harm we are doing to the planet.
My page on the Turnbull government exposes a number of lies about fossil fuels and renewable energy.
I've tried to raise awareness of the irresponsibility of greenhouse emissions by comparing the dumping of waste gasses into the atmosphere to dumping rubbish on roadsides.
The trigger that caused me to write this page was the dishonest, shameful and criminal blaming of the South Australian power outages of September and December 2016, wholesale price spikes, and the load-shedding of February 2017 on renewable energy.
Climate scientists have told us for years that storms will become more violent with climate change. It would be more honest to blame the power outages on climate change than on renewable energy.
The Conversation, 2016/09/29: What caused South Australia's state-wide blackout?; by Andrew King, Dylan McConnell, Hugh Saddler, Nicky Ison and Roger Dargaville.
Why did energy regulators deliberately turn out the lights in South Australia?, 2017/02/10; by Hugh Saddler.
The SA power-outage of 2017/02/09 was due to bad management, not renewables; another page on this site; relating to the Turnbull Government.
The fact is that South Australia's adoption of renewable energy has been a
Yet Queensland, with only one big solar power station and no large wind farms at all, had far more price spikes than South Australia, as shown in the graph from RenewEconomy reproduced on the right.
This again is blatant and criminal dishonesty from those supporting fossil fuels and opposing renewable energy.
Also contrary to statements by supporters of fossil fuels, problems with the electrical supply in SA around that time were due to unprecedented storms and poor decisions made by the operator of the day-to-day power supply.
Some of the settings in the way wind farms were connecting to the grid did contribute to the state-wide blackout, but this was nothing to do with the variable nature or any other fundamental property of the state's renewable energy. These settings were corrected following the blackout.
External pagesOmnicide: Who is responsible for the gravest of all crimes?; by Danielle Celermajer, an opinion piece posted in ABC Religion and Ethics, 3rd January 2020.
Relating particularly to Australia:
[Australian PM] Scott Morrison, the Murdochs and the crime of the century; written by Alan Kohler, published in NewDaily, 2021/04/26.
Key Points; Australia:
Australian BoM; Climate change and variability;
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO); Climate change information for Australia;
Australian Academy of Science: changes we are already seeing will continue and intensify, coral reefs and alpine ecosystem particularly vulnerable, fire danger will greatly increase in intensity and length of the fire-danger season.
"Heatwaves are among the highest-impact climate events in terms of human health in Australia. In very hot conditions, people can suffer from heat stress, especially vulnerable individuals such as the sick and elderly. Warmer temperatures in future will lead to increased occurrences of heatwaves."The Conversation: Extreme heat poses a billion-dollar threat to Australia's economy, 2015/05/05; Kerstin Zander, Elspeth Oppermann, Stephen Garnett. A quote:
"In a paper published today in Nature Climate Change, we and colleagues show that heat stress probably cost the Australian economy nearly A$7 billion in 2013-2014 through productivity losses..."
Related pages: The effects of climate change: ExtinctionsProceedings of the Royal Society B: How does climate change cause extinction? 2012/10/17;
"Climate change is now recognized as a major threat to global biodiversity, and one that is already causing widespread local extinctions."
Wikipedia: Extinction risk from global warming, lists many links, and has a quote from the International Panel for Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report:
"Anthropogenic warming could lead to some impacts that are abrupt or irreversible, depending upon the rate and magnitude of the climate change."
The Guardian, Power plan maps out route to follow for 100% renewable energy future, by Michael Slezak.
The Conversation, 2016/05/02, Phasing out fossil fuels for renewables may not be a straightforward swap, by Anthony James, National Centre for Sustainability, Swinburne University of Technology.
Finkel Report, Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market; Preliminary Report; December 2016
By Dr Alan Finkel AO, Chief Scientist, Chair of the Expert Panel, Ms Karen Moses FAICD, Ms Chloe Munro, Mr Terry Effeney, Professor Mary O'Kane AC.
"Seven key themes are identified, each supported by specific questions to be raised with the community.
CSIRO Renewable Energy Integration Facility. "As the demand and use of renewable energy technologies in both commercial and residential environments increases, understanding how electricity generated by these sources can be integrated into future grid designs is critical."
The Conversation, 2017/02/22, How South Australia can function reliably while moving to 100% renewable power, Mark Diesendorf, Associate Professor, Interdisciplinary Environment Studies, University of NSW; February 22, 2017
Pumped Hydro storage can secure 100% renewable electricity; by Andrew Blakers, Matt Stocks and Bin Lu, Australian National University, 2017/02/20.
For more information see an article in
Renew Economy by Sophie Vorrath, 2019/02/08.
Doctors for the Environment, Australia;
"The burning of coal emits hazardous air pollutants, including particulate matter, sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, carbon dioxide, mercury and arsenic.
Base load power: the facts
Climate change disasters
Opposing renewable energy is a Crime against humanity
The end of coal
Good and bad people
Impressive renewable energy developments in Australia
Major threatened disasters compared
Mid-North South Australia, leading the nation in renewable energy
The Morrison Australian Government
Northern SA's renewables
South Australia's great success with renewable energy
Wind power in Australia
The Turnbull Australian Government
Why accept climate science
Why would you do that?
Another type of criminal
Burning fossil fuels an environmental disaster
Combined ill-effects of climate change
Facts on SA's power outages and what moved me to write this page
Higher flood flows
How to judge the seriousness of a crime?
Related pages; effects of climate change
Related pages: environmental disaster
Related pages; general
Related pages; legal decision
Related pages: replacing fossil fuels with renewables
Related pages on this site
Photo: defoliation of red stringybark
Photo: Bangor fire erosion sediment
Photo: transmission lines downed by exceptional storm
Reducing fossil fuel consumption is possible and viable
South Australia, renewables and electricity costs
What constitutes a crime?
On another pageHoward Zinn on the problem of civil obedience